<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Websalad Internet Marketing &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.websalad.com.au/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.websalad.com.au</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 03:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Get the Right SEO Help &#8211; You&#8217;ll Sleep Better!</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-help-you-will-sleep-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-help-you-will-sleep-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=2134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet that when you or your organisation set-up your website the anticipation of getting your first visitors was exhilarating. After all, visitors are the life blood of any website&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/sleep.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2159" title="sleep" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/sleep.png" alt="" width="230" height="230" /></a>I bet that when you or your organisation set-up your website the anticipation of getting your first visitors was exhilarating. After all, <strong>visitors are the life blood of any website</strong> and a steady supply is needed each and every month.</p>
<p><strong>But how do you keep them coming back?</strong></p>
<p>For most businesses it isn’t long before they realise that <a href="http://www.websalad.com.au/coreservices/search-engine-marketing/seo/">Search Engine Optimisation (SEO)</a> is worth investigating (chances are that it is one of the reasons why you are reading this <em>right now</em>).</p>
<p>SEO is a process that is designed to increase the number of results pages your website comes up for when someone searches for your products or services using Google.com or Yahoo.com etc.</p>
<p>In an effort to keep costs down you may be tempted to hire a ‘friend of a friend’ or take up a similarly cheap option to try and <strong>improve your SEO rankings</strong>. This can be a costly mistake. The threat of your website being punished is real if your consultant attempts any prohibited SEO tactics in the opinion of search engine providers. Yet if you get it right, the world can be <em>yours</em>!</p>
<p>One of the biggest problems we encounter when taking control of failing SEO campaigns is the damage already done by poorly executed SEO previously applied to the website in question. At times we are amazed that some websites haven’t already been banned – a nightmare scenario for <em>any</em> website owner.</p>
<p><strong>Search Engine Optimisation is powerful</strong> in the right hands and you should strive to ensure that the people that you trust to manage your SEO know what they are doing. A good consultant will take real, positive steps towards cranking your website to its fullest potential. Choose wisely!</p>
<p>If you are serious about getting some <strong>real SEO muscle</strong> for your website then <a href="http://www.websalad.com.au/contact/">get in touch with us</a>. We focus on conversions (measurable outcomes that <em>boost</em> your bottom line) for your website. It’s a specialist service that we take great pride in being renowned for and one that we can’t wait to unleash on your website.﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-help-you-will-sleep-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Metrics: The Big Four</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/web-metrics-the-big-four/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/web-metrics-the-big-four/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=1565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m not sure how many of you out there have read Avinash Kaushik’s new book, “Web Analytics 2.0” but if you haven’t yet managed to feast your eyes on this&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1567" title="iStock_000000075011XSmall" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/iStock_000000075011XSmall-300x199.jpg" alt="iStock_000000075011XSmall" width="295" height="196" />I’m not sure how many of you out there have read Avinash Kaushik’s new book, “Web Analytics 2.0” but if you haven’t yet managed to feast your eyes on this beauty, then I would strongly advise you to get your hands on one. I’m normally not subject to book reviews, I normally leave that to the dedicated bookworms of Amazon.com, so I’m not going to delve into that here…</p>
<p><strong>Let’s get straight down to business, shall we? </strong></p>
<div id="attachment_1585" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 192px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1585" title="weighty_tome" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/weighty_tome.jpg" alt="weighty_tome" width="182" height="176" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A glorious tome.</p></div>
<p>There’s a chapter located within the great tome of “Web Metrics 2.0”, Avinash’s colossal phone-book sized effort at disinterring the myths of forgotten web metrics, called ‘web metrics demystified’ that details four dimensions of analysis that will help you expose the trivialities of a number of useless SEO metrics out there that do nothing but waste your time and energy with vacuous reporting, complex tiers and vague relevancy. In this chapter, Avinash hinders upon web metrics being highly subjective to the nature of the business. Despite most ireful analysts viewing this statement as stale and far-fetched, the common sense here is too hard to ignore. Whether you’re a business owner or a search analyst, you can devote an insane number of hours to analytics tools that don’t necessarily quantify the most important data from your website.</p>
<p>On the chapter ‘demystifying’ web metrics, the author presents a set of rules for selecting and refining your way through a myriad number of web metrics that exist out there…</p>
<blockquote><p>“In a world where metrics and ket performance indicators are a dime a dozen, how do you know which one is your must-have darling?”</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_1589" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 256px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1589" style="padding-top: 10px; padding-right: 15px;" title="docbrown2" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/docbrown2-300x225.jpg" alt="docbrown2" width="246" height="195" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Doc and McFly: Outwardly complex</p></div>
<p>The first lesson taught is that your web metrics should be uncomplex. You shouldn’t be using the enigma code book as a guide to generating complex and speculative formulas that determine what the user had for breakfast after he/she has clicked a button. If you develop this complex formula, who is really going to benefit from it if only you understand it and it would be easier teaching Japanese to a monkey over explaining it to someone else. The metrics that you decide to use for a website should be simple, with a logical explanation behind them so they can be easily picked up by someone else working with you. If someone else doesn’t understand the metrics, then how can you expect them to take action on your findings? Keep it simple so others can interpret, take action and subsequently get the job done.</p>
<p>The second lesson is relevancy, and I think that this one is pretty common sense stuff. The universally accepted notion is that all metrics will be subjective to the business model of your company or your client’s company. The metrics that you identify need to be relevant to measuring the success objectives that are unique to you and your website, or the client and their website. In order to gauge the relevancy of the metrics to your business align the needs of the business with key statistical indicators – there are a number of these, but I’ll list a few: Task completion rates, share of search percentages, Visitor loyalty and recency, RSS and blog subscribers, percentage of valuable exits, conversion rate percentages such as cart and checkout abandonment, days and visits to purpose… The list goes on. Make sure you know what the core metrics are and do your research thoroughly!  The most common mistake made by web analysts is that they stick to their comfort zones when selecting web metrics, and some indicators that they’re comfortable using may not align directly with the needs of the business.<img class="size-full wp-image-1595 alignright" title="btf2" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/btf2.png" alt="btf2" width="300" height="188" /></p>
<p>The third lesson mentioned is that your web metrics need to be timely. The bottom line here is that you should set up your reporting models and analysis intervals when the business needs it most. One month is a good starting point for most businesses, including online retailers because it gives you and your client ample time to test the cause and effect of different implementations. You can’t get lazy with your metrics, reporting and tracking needs to be timely in order for your business to gain any benefit. Avinash mentions that some people have even stressed real-time mentions, but I completely agree when I say that this is utter garbage… Real-Time…? You’ll find yourself doing more reporting than actual work.</p>
<p>The fourth lesson is that metrics should be instantly useful. I don’t need to be putting this in my own words, because the author sums it up perfectly in a single sentence:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Instantly useful is when you understand quickly what the metric is and you can find the first blush of insights as soon as you look at it.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, the author mentions something called ClickTracks but I’m pretty sure you’d still get the same pretty picture using Google Analytics. Make sure you’re staying on top of your main referral sources so you can easily ascertain what elements require more work and which elements don’t. The premise of this point is that a great, useful metric allows you to look at it at a glance and you instantly know what needs attention.</p>
<p>Not a bad insight, right? If you haven&#8217;t checked out <a title="web analytics 2" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.webanalytics20.com/">this book</a> we highly recommend it. We should know, we have 4 copies <img src='http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/web-metrics-the-big-four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO for Meta Titles: Clean and Crisp</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-for-meta-titles-clean-and-crisp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-for-meta-titles-clean-and-crisp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta titles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s time to revisit the old SEO cookbook here, particularly after reading a lot of opinions on a trivial topic with a prevalent answer already outlined in black and white.&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1397" title="hausfrau" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/hausfrau.jpg" alt="hausfrau" width="344" height="274" />It’s time to revisit the old SEO cookbook here, particularly after reading a lot of opinions on a trivial topic with a prevalent answer already outlined in black and white. There is a lot of speculation that strategic placement of keywords within the HTML elements of a page do not make your page any more or less favourable to search engine crawlers.</p>
<p>If you believed this assumption to be true, you’re wrong!</p>
<p>A web page is like a blank canvas, although there are a myriad number of places to place your keywords within the web page, there will always remain to be elements that are more visible than others – to both the human eye, as well as the eyes of the search engine. Strategic keyword placement can potentially increase both your online conversions, as well as your search engine rank. Here’s why:</p>
<p>Meta Title Tags – The first 65 characters (incl. spaces) and what is included within them is seen to be the most imperative organic search engine ranking factor. Why? These are the keywords that translate the main theme of your website to search engines. When you’re created a website, you should ensure that all of your pages are optimised with uniquely written meta title tags. If you’re running an E-Commerce website with thousands of pages, you should generate a unique format that pulls your Meta title tags from database information. Include your primary keywords towards the front of the title tag, aim for a max. of 3 keyword inclusions within your meta page titles if you can fit them all in 65 characters.</p>
<p>One important thing to note is, meta title tags are visible on search engine result pages. When you’re writing these, it is best to keep in mind that it will be visible to your average user. Read your titles back to yourself when you have written them, if they don’t make sense to you then they need some more work.</p>
<p>You may think that structuring titles is easy, but they actually require some intense thinking. Here’s some pointers based on my own personal experience writing these kill-joys (I says kill-joy because too much title tag writing can drive you insane! Especially if you’re doing more than 50 pages in one sitting):</p>
<ol>
<li> <strong>Have a master keyword list</strong> – you should have conducted thorough keyword research around your main website theme before you start work on optimising your web page. It helps keep your keywords consistent if you have a measurable list to refer to.</li>
<li><strong>Start top-level and work your way down</strong> – Start within the sitemap of your web page. Identify your top level themes. Commonly, these will end with a singular sub-directory eg. <a href="http://www.tscamerahouse.com.au">http://www.tscamerahouse.com.au/digital-cameras.html</a></li>
<li><strong>Top Level Themes </strong>– Use generic, highly competitive terms. These are the pages that will carry the most authority as your website matures.</li>
<li><strong>Refine keyword themes as you work down each level </strong>– Specific product pages for example should relate to the product itself.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Some construction pointers:</strong></p>
<p>It’s all about keyword relevance and proximity. You don’t have to write a sentence in your title tags for it to be lucid enough for readers to understand. Select 5 keywords relevant to your theme, let’s look at <a href="http://www.digitalbestbuys.com.au">Digital Best Buys</a>:</p>
<p>[sourcecode language="plain"]&lt;title&gt;Buy Cheap Digital Cameras Online: Compare Cheapest Digital Cameras&lt;/title&gt;[/sourcecode]</p>
<p>There are about 5-6 keyword variations within that title alone, and it’s also easy on the user’s eyes. Be highly relevant and straight to the point. If you’re repeating keywords, in this case “digital cameras” ensure that there is a gap between the repetition if possible as you do not want to be identified as a keyword stuffer, for example it would be bad practice to write the above as:</p>
<p>[sourcecode language="plain"]&lt;title&gt;Buy Cheap Digital Cameras: Digital Cameras at Digital Best Buys&lt;/title&gt;[/sourcecode]</p>
<p>Write the title for the user, but be search engine conscious. Do this and you’ll have yourself some clean and crisp title tags to complement your on-site SEO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-for-meta-titles-clean-and-crisp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Analytics for Facebook Fan Pages</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/google-analytics-for-facebook-fan-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/google-analytics-for-facebook-fan-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics for Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So here I am, sipping on my morning coffee reading through the Search Engine Journal when I stumble across this little gem. The time has finally come; there is a&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-1175 alignleft" title="Dropping the Bomb" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/BatmanWithBomb-259x300.jpg" alt="Dropping the Bomb" width="259" height="300" />So here I am, sipping on my morning coffee reading through the <a title="search engine journal" href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/" target="_blank">Search Engine Journal</a> when I stumble across this little gem. The time has finally come; <strong>there is a way that you can add Google Analytics Tracking to your Facebook fan pages</strong>. Thanks to the innovation of a web development team in the UK, it is now possible to get some <em>decent </em>metrics from your Facebook pages.</p>
<p>We’ve tested this code on the <a title="websalad on facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com/freshwebthinking" target="_blank">Websalad Facebook fan page</a> and we’re eagerly awaiting the next update of our Analytics account, so in the meantime please go easy on us! To spare you the grief of reading through an entire blog article, here’s the simplest way to set up GA for your Facebook Fan Page:</p>
<ol>
<li>The first requirement is that you have a custom landing page implemented – if you don’t, I suggest you download <a title="static fbml" href="http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=4949752878" target="_blank">Static FBML</a> and get cracking.</li>
<li> Assuming you already have a Google Analytics account, create a new website profile for Facebook. Name it as Facebook.com or Facebook.com/custom_page_URL. You will then be given the standard tracking code that looks like: UA-2582437-1</li>
<li> Create your own custom image tag for page you want to track, note that you can only insert the code where there are instances of FBML. If you want to track you news feed, you can always insert a static FBML box however we haven’t tested this as of yet. For starters, you’re best to try this on your custom FBML landing page. Use the Web Digi <a title="google analytics generator" href="http://ga.webdigi.co.uk/" target="_blank">Google Analytics Generator</a> to generate your tag.</li>
<li> Add the image tag to the bottom of your FBML code on the fan page you want to track – then sit back and wait for the update.</li>
</ol>
<p>Hats off to the guys at <a title="web digi" href="http://www.webdigi.co.uk" target="_blank">WebDigi</a> who unearthed this beauty, it’d definitely be cool to see it work.</p>
<p>Stay tuned as we’re going to update this post once we receive our Analytics update – Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/google-analytics-for-facebook-fan-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polishing Your Inbound Link Network</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/polishing-your-inbound-link-network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/polishing-your-inbound-link-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Link building is one big game of chicken. Bold statement, yes, but there is perfectly valid reasoning to it. The object of link building in SEO is to increase the&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1071" title="chicken" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/chicken.jpg" alt="chicken" width="350" height="350" />Link building is one big game of chicken. Bold statement, yes, but there is perfectly valid reasoning to it. The object of link building in SEO is to increase the power of your link profile by creating as many links pointing inward to your site as possible, but the element of the game that makes it so hard to play is that your links need to be relevant and natural. Why? Well, simply because you don&#8217;t want to have to endure the pain of having your hard work penalised by search engines demoting your rank due to a highly artificial link network. So where does the game of chicken come in here&#8230;? It&#8217;s pretty easy to identify with &#8211; you&#8217;re trying to outflank your competitors in SERPs for target keywords whilst endeavouring not to trip any Google-wires or alarms that will persecute your website authority. The game is chicken because it&#8217;s you vs. your online competition &#8211; how far will you go in order to achieve the largest link network, and at what cost?</p>
<p>Link building always comes with the underlying threat of penalisation, but the game itself is actually easier than you think, and funnily enough, the answer is right in front of you: <strong>work with the search engine and take its side when constructing your inbound link network</strong>. Search engines give more reward to an organic link structure, as they recognise the difficulty of obtaining organic links as well as the scarcity. A search engine views organic links as a key indicator of your website&#8217;s popularity. So the question is, how can you as a website owner build a polished inbound link network consisting entirely of natural links?</p>
<h5>Here are a few factors you need to consider when building a link network full of digital relics and rubies:</h5>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium  wp-image-1104" title="popeye" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/popeye-227x300.jpg" alt="popeye" width="227" height="300" /></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Go natural with your links</strong> &#8211; This one is blatantly obvious and reiterates the above point. Search engines value organic    links, and disregard artificial links. A natural link structure is one that maintains the following characteristics: the inbound anchor link text varies, there is only a gradual increase  in the number of inbound links, the website only links outbound to reputable websites and there are barely any reciprocal links. So what are artificial links? Firstly, all anchor text links are normally identical, secondly the inbound link count displays drastic increases in a short period of time. What else? Oh yeah, the outbound links suck &#8211; often linking out  to satellite websites that no-one cares about (nor does Google for that matter) and a high percentage of the links pointing inbound are reciprocal&#8230; Indicating to the search engine  that there has been some sort of exchange taking place &#8211; not good at all. <em>Artificial links are like steroids&#8230; </em>They inject massive growth into the website, and will perhaps contribute to some short term success, only to have the panel of Google bots knock them back to a position worse from which they started&#8230; And in the world of search,  redemption is hard.</li>
<li><img class="size-medium  wp-image-1084 alignleft" title="bear-grylls" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/bear-grylls-300x186.jpg" alt="bear-grylls" width="228" height="141" /><strong>High authority links &gt; Life </strong>- Rather than aimlessly shooting for links, do some research into the authority of a website and its popularity. One singular link with a website with, let&#8217;s say, a Google PageRank of 7 is more likely to be of more benefit than 5 links from a website that has a PageRank of 3. And hey, if you’re capable of scoring links with a super high PageRank then in my opinion, you’re badder than Bear Grylls himself!</li>
<li><strong>Link relevance </strong>- I bet you&#8217;ve read this everywhere, and you&#8217;re reading it now, and you&#8217;re sick of reading it but for some reason you can&#8217;t look away&#8230; It&#8217;s kind of hypnotic isn&#8217;t it? HA! It&#8217;s true though, as clichéd as it is. When scouting the web for link opportunities, you should aim for trusted sites (sites that have been around for a while, normally with a Page Rank of 5 &gt;) that are topically relevant. If your website sells ice to eskimos, then aim to score some links in some online innuit communities.<img class="alignright  size-full wp-image-1092" title="home-alone-scream" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/home-alone-scream.jpg" alt="home-alone-scream" width="182" height="204" /></li>
<li><strong>Referring pages should only have a couple of links</strong> &#8211; In a perfect world, high authority domains would provide a link to your site and your site only. Unfortunately it just doesn&#8217;t happen this way. If you do score a link-back from a nice, hearty domain then make sure that the domain is being liberal on the link juice. When a website lists too many outbound links, regardless of the site authority, securing a link from said website is virtually pointless because your link value will be diluted and shared by the other sites. You wouldn&#8217;t pour yourself a watered down cup of cordial, would you? Treat your inbound links with the same regard, otherwise you&#8217;re going to end up like junior over here when you find out that all of your hard work account for nothing.</li>
<li><strong>Site-wide links</strong> &#8211; If you can secure yourself a site-wide link&#8230; Say, on a blogroll with a hundred pages or so, then you&#8217;re luckier than Falcor the magical luckdragon. Honestly though, you&#8217;ve got to be extremely cautious with this sort of stuff. If you secure a site-wide link and that website already has an excessive amount of cached pages in existence, then your link count is going to explode and your domain is going to be penalised. If you want a natural blog-roll link, secure the link early whilst the blog is still in its prenatal stages. This way, your link count will only increase incrementally with each new blog post &#8211; Google sees nothing wrong with this!<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1097" title="tns_044Falkor" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/tns_044Falkor.jpg" alt="tns_044Falkor" width="393" height="166" /></li>
<li><strong>Incoming link URL format</strong> &#8211; promoting 5 or so different home page URL variations is not good practice &#8211; you&#8217;re actually doing yourself more harm than good here because you&#8217;re effectively diluting the link value. For example:
<ul>
<li>http://websalad.com.au</li>
<li>http://websalad.com.au/</li>
<li>http://www.websalad.com.au</li>
<li>http://www.websalad.com.au/</li>
<li>http://www.websalad.com.au/home</li>
</ul>
<p>All mean the same thing! It just means that you&#8217;re sharing the link value across different variations and it&#8217;s doing nothing in your favour. Choose one inbound link format and stick to it. As for external sites linking to your homepage, unfortunately you will have no control as to how they set their URLs. If a website does link to your page via a different variation, it mightn&#8217;t hurt to send them a suggested destination URL.</li>
<li><strong>Keyword anchor text links</strong> &#8211; Common sense! Pass on the link value via target keywords. Obtaining keyword links in directories is hard to obtain, but there&#8217;s nothing stopping you from targeting niche forums and blogs. One thing to note, make sure there is a diversity of keywords in your link network. Linking to the same keyword over and over will trip a spam filter.</li>
<li><strong>Go Deep</strong> &#8211; Try to aim for at least 40% of your links to be pointing to pages deeper within your website other than the home page. The idea with deep links to have the external link pointing to a page within your website that is more content related.<br />
<img class="alignright size-full  wp-image-1106" title="nofollow" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/nofollow2.jpg" alt="nofollow" width="241" height="185" /></li>
<li><strong>No Follow Links suck</strong> &#8211; No follow links are common SEO knowledge, however if you&#8217;re new to this it might save you a lot of trouble in future to know. A few years ago, Google implemented a html attribute entitled link rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; &#8211; the purpose of this attribute is simple, to render your link effort useless to the search engine. This tactic was deployed to remove the spamming incentive to drop links in any random internet domain. When you&#8217;re looking for links back to your website, it is imperative that these links are what we like to call &#8220;do follow&#8221;, it just means that the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; attribute hasn&#8217;t been applied to your links and you&#8217;re still getting the Google juice. If you have Firefox, might I recommend that you try the <a rel="nofollow" href=" https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/321">&#8220;search status&#8221; toolbar</a>. It has a nice little &#8220;nofollow&#8221; link identifier that can save you a lot of trouble!</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Where to get started…</strong></p>
<p>Now, reading the above information is all fine and dandy but it might be a little bit overwhelming and at times vexing if you’re trying to do it all yourself. The link building game is one giant, time-consuming puzzle. There are billions of pages on the internet, so if you have a vacated look on your face it’s easily justified. If you’re looking for places to start then you might want to try some of the following:</p>
<p><strong>Directory Listings </strong>– Directory websites are perhaps the most boring sites in existence, but their purpose is extremely useful to build up your inbound link count. There are millions of online directories, but as long as you assess each directory website with the above criteria it should make the selection process a hell of a lot easier. Here are some of the web’s premier directories (be aware that some of these are paid directories):</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Local –</strong></li>
<li>Hotfrog.com.au</li>
<li>Diggyguide.com.au</li>
<li>Localbusinessguide.com.au</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Web-wide –</strong></li>
<li>DMOZ.org</li>
<li>Joeant.com</li>
<li>Dir.yahoo.com</li>
<li>Business.com</li>
<li>Botw.org</li>
<li>Skaffe.com</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Niche forums and communities</strong> – Do a bit of research into the social communities surrounding your target niche. An easy way to isolate relevant blogs and forums is to utilize the “show options” feature on the Google search bar, then refine the search based on what you want to target accordingly – as seen in the below example:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1068" title="google-refine-options" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/google-refine-options.jpg" alt="google-refine-options" width="467" height="394" /></p>
<p>Thanks for reading, we hope you found this post helpful. Until the next time, adios!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/polishing-your-inbound-link-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Spammers: Thanks for the Laughs!</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-spammers-thanks-for-the-laughs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-spammers-thanks-for-the-laughs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO red flags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The search engine market is serious business, and like all aspects to business there will always be those who self-aggrandize through content that offers minimal value to clients and consumers.&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1059" title="omgz" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/omgz.jpg" alt="omgz" width="350" height="263" />The search engine market is serious business, and like all aspects to business there will always be those who self-aggrandize through content that offers minimal value to clients and consumers. It’s common knowledge that success online means adding value, when it comes to building your online reputation anyway. For the little guy to have a chance against search giants, it would be naïve to think that they could possibly stand a fighting chance without building up their website authority –in addition to the standard practice of building up content and promoting genuine user engagement, link building is also a common practice to build up your inbound link count and number of online referrals.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769">Google recognises</a> that link building is still a part of the trade and acknowledges this, but there are ways to go about building up your inbound link count that are legitimate – put simply, Google doesn’t mind link building so long as you’re not spamming, or <q>black-hatting</q> as it is colloquially known. Not sure about what Google considers to be a black-hat practice? Here’s what Google recommends:</p>
<ol>
<li> Make pages primarily for users, not for search engines.</li>
<li>Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings.</li>
<li> Don&#8217;t participate in link schemes designed to increase your site&#8217;s ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to web spammers or &#8220;bad neighborhoods&#8221; on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links.</li>
<li> Don&#8217;t use unauthorized computer programs to submit pages, check rankings, etc. Such programs consume computing resources and violate our Terms of Service. Google does not recommend the use of products that send automatic or programmatic queries to Google.</li>
</ol>
<p>Google does well to paraphrase the above for points in a comment made on the official Google Webmaster blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>*Our general advice is: Always focus on the users and not on search engines when developing your optimization strategy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Every “by-the-book” SEO knows and understands the quality guidelines, but there are still a lot of companies out there who love nothing better than to turn the internet into a spammy scrap-yard with their exploits. In light of these wonderful men, women and… uhhhh…. Robots who continue to abuse the loopholes in search I would like to give my personal thank you for some good <a title="lolz" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lulz#Variations_on_the_theme" target="_blank">lolz</a> over the years. To the readers of this post, whether you&#8217;re an SEO guru or a novice, here’s a little bit of trivial link-fodder to lighten up your day:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>The  blog comment-bot that barely speaks English</strong> – Every time I log into the Websalad blog to moderate comments, I’m always given a cheap laugh or two by the same spammer types who try ever so hard to make me hit the “approve” button. Thanks for “enjoying” our articles and letting us know that you will “bull-whip it” as often as you can…
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1050" title="websalad-blogpost-comment" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/websalad-blogpost-comment.jpg" alt="websalad-blogpost-comment" width="480" height="240" /><br />
</br></li>
<li><strong>The pointless post</strong> – It feels like millions of my brain cells die every time I set my eyes on an abysmal post topic, often Twitter related, adding little to no value to anyone reading it and at times boasting a hearty following of social media drones – all of them reverberating the same response over-and-over…. To this day, I still cannot believe that people are making thousands off  Twitter “how-to” publications, but I might save that rant for another  time.
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1053" title="abysmal post" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/abysmalpost.JPG" alt="abysmal post" width="486" height="143" /><br />
</br>
</li>
<li><strong>The internal link harvest</strong> – get ready, the HTML files are fertile and their links are a-grown’! The link harvester always gives me a bit of a chuckle. Here’s one hilarious *example I came across&#8230; What is it that they sell? Chocolate cake&#8230;? Try and guess:
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1054" title="internal-linking-fail" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/internal-linking-fail.png" alt="internal-linking-fail" width="600" height="329" /><br />
</br>
</li>
</ol>
<p>We&#8217;ve only shown a few examples, but there is<em> a lot out there</em>. Do you have any hilarious SEO spam examples to share? Drop us a comment and share them &#8211; we love a laugh or two!</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/12/building-link-based-popularity.html" target="_blank">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/12/building-link-based-popularity.html</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.seofailblog.com/internal-linking-fail" target="_blank">http://www.seofailblog.com/internal-linking-fail</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-spammers-thanks-for-the-laughs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Battle of the CMS</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/wordpress-vs-joomla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/wordpress-vs-joomla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content management systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joomla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joomla vs wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=1010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to selecting a content management system that best suits your criteria, there are hundreds of free CMS platforms to download online – each with the promise of&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-1021 alignleft" title="wordpress-vs-joomla-battle" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/wordpressjoomlabattle.jpg" alt="wordpress-vs-joomla-battle" width="390" height="293" />When it comes to selecting a content management system that best suits your criteria, there are hundreds of free CMS platforms to download online – each with the promise of easy navigation, simple data import tools and with formatting so easy you may as well be drawing the design on your screen with crayons. From our experience in selecting content management systems for development, it’s really all a case of giving certain platforms the preferential treatment; even in doing so however we’re still in a bit of a quandary when it comes to choosing the right platform for the job – It all comes down to analysing the business requirements, but we’ll save that for a bit later… Let’s start with a simple, objective comparison of two of our favourite content management systems. Thanks to a bit of research online and some web development insight, we’re pleased to bring you…</p>
<h5><strong>WordPress (open-source) vs. Joomla!</strong></h5>
<p><strong>Dun dun dunnn DUNNNNNN….</strong></p>
<p>Maybe ignore the lame use of onomatopoeia, but I figured some sort of a drum roll/suspense siren call was needed in order to emphasise the importance of the clash. Just don’t get all judgmental on me here ‘cos I’m a bit of a nerd with English. Let’s get stuck into it then!</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The battle begins now…</span></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1028" title="sp-guitar-hero" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/spgh2-300x232.jpg" alt="sp-guitar-hero" width="300" height="232" />WordPress, like its other content management brethren, is a PHP – MySQL based application that runs off a database. The WP engine is built for the sole purpose of making the content publishing process as painless as possible, and the execution of its purpose is unparalleled by other content management systems through its clever and innovative blogging interface… But that’s just it, WordPress might by an open source CMS but its primary purpose is to function as a publishing application. The inherent flaw here is that it should not be used to host enormous databases, mainly concerning the hosting of product databases. A simple product database can be easily accommodated by the WordPress CMS, however if you’re looking to expand your product range entailing more complex product variations and IDs, then Joomla tends to outperform WordPress given its comprehensive database search functions and its inherent ability to handle larger databases without plugins – its ecommerce plugins are also exceptional.</p>
<p>When WordPress is configured to manage a checkout system with an expansive product range on top of several content sections as well as a blog, you will find that management of the CMS will become increasingly difficult and SEO problems will start to appear throughout your pages…  Why, do you ask? Because the platform was never initially built for complex product databases; Sure there are plugins available on WordPress to help you manage the metadata of hundreds of pages, handle dynamic URLs for different page categories and filter out duplicate URLs, but the reality is that you’re only creating more work for yourself and your business by attempting to juggle all of these issues at once. A fully-loaded CMS such as Joomla is already engineered to deal with larger databases – so it’s better for handling a multiple amount of content sections. Suffice to say, you should not at all discount WordPress for not having the features you require built-in, because truth be told no CMS is built perfectly and even Joomla will require multiple plugins for various facets.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1026" title="warning" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/tumblr_kqf7hxl36N1qztjn5o1_500-300x226.png" alt="warning" width="300" height="226" /></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Moving on&#8230;</span></strong></p>
<p>One thing that’s a common factor in determining a good CMS is the quality of security it provides to keep your database safe. It wouldn’t be fair to nominate one CMS as having more security flaws than the other, but when looking at the context of how each content management system is used – security issues in WordPress tend to be more common given the sheer size of its user-base. In contrasting the security issues of both platforms, WordPress seems to be more susceptible to input validation attacks such as SQL injections that manipulate strings within the code due to flaws in its PHP construct. Joomla on the other hand is also just as susceptible to input validation attacks similar to those in WordPress, however I would envisage that these would be less common due to the smaller user-base. It seems that each CMS can ensure that it’s protected against such attacks by performing regular backups and sanitising the code before using a SQL query – I’m fairly sure that this issue has been addressed in the latest versions WordPress and Joomla.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1029" title="avada_kedavra" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/avada_kedavra2_1-300x225.jpg" alt="avada_kedavra" width="300" height="225" /></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">SEO compatibility</span></strong></p>
<p>When it comes to the support of search engine optimisation, it’s “<em>Avada Kedavra</em>” to every single other content management system because WordPress is unquestionably the industry leader for the quality of plugins, as you can make your entire website search engine friendly within a few clicks and keystrokes – and when we say, “quality of plugins” we’re referring to them from a usability point of view as they are very accessible and relatively easy to locate. If you want to be comparing SEO modules from a performance standpoint, then the best plugins available on both WordPress and Joomla achieve the same results. We personally prefer WordPress for its All-in-One SEO pack, however Joomla delivers its own SEO power-house plugin… What are we talkin’? We’re talkin’ JoomSEF, baby!</p>
<p>I’m sure if you laid the top two plugins side by side, you’d develop a few prejudices towards one or the other, but for the time being just accept that fact that the SEO support of both content management systems is pretty much where it needs to be.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">So what’s the verdict..?</span></strong></p>
<p>It’s too hard to point a discerning finger directly at either WordPress or Joomla based on the simple fact that each of their applications is entirely subjective. How we determine which CMS to use is fairly simple: we scale up the client’s needs. If a client is looking for an ‘out of the box’, no nonsense CMS to manage simple product or function then we use WordPress, however if the client is a larger enterprise, let’s say a large retail chain for example, we use Joomla to handle the complexity of the database.</p>
<p>So there you have it… There’s our side by side comparison of two of our recommended content management systems. End result? No-one wins. Our programmers prefer Joomla, and our designers put their money on WordPress.</p>
<p>Got an opinion on these two amazing systems? Now is the time to vent your true feelings…</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1038" title="homerdoor" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/homerdoor1.jpg" alt="homerdoor" width="500" height="375" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/wordpress-vs-joomla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO For Google Maps</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-for-google-maps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-for-google-maps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Business Listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO for Google Maps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s be blunt here and put it simply… Optimising for Google Maps via the Google Local Business Center will drive you &#8220;frickin&#8217; insane&#8221;, and from my own personal experience, if&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-975 alignleft" title="world domination" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/world-domination-300x189.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="189" /></p>
<p>Let’s be blunt here and put it simply… <strong>Optimising for Google Maps via the Google Local Business Center will drive you &#8220;frickin&#8217; insane&#8221;</strong>, and from my own personal experience, if you’re looking to set up listings on behalf of multiple brands within a certain time frame – you may as well quit your job now and declare yourself a telemarketer.</p>
<p>So is the end result worth the toil and frustration? The short answer is yes, and the catalyst behind the ever-more important inclusion of Google Maps into your SEO strategy is the shift towards optimising for local search with Google itself placing a stronger emphasis on local search results. But competing for those top spots for target search terms within geo-specific maps listings is turning into a visceral dogfight between local businesses who are still a little bit confused as to what SEO factors actually contribute to the calculation of their maps rankings.</p>
<p>If you’re a business owner (with a basic knowledge of search) trawling cyberspace for a lucid response to Google Maps optimisation, the odds are that you’ll encounter a whole heap of SEO jargon that does nothing but aggrandize a company or its services without giving too much away about the practice itself. Let me be truthful in saying that when I first started applying Google Maps as part of our search strategies, even I found it to be extremely vague… But it’s changed now, and after digging deep around the topic as well as regularly toying around with listing confirmations and errors I feel that my own personal understanding of the Google local business center has grown immeasurably.</p>
<p>Therefore in conjunction with KeyRelevance’s director of optimisation strategies, Chris Silver Smith, and his extremely helpful <a title="how google maps works" rel="nofollow" href="http://videos.webpronews.com/2009/02/11/smx-west-2009-improving-google-maps-search-rankings/" target="_blank">video explanation at SMX</a> &#8211; I bring to you a coherent explanation of how Google local business center calculates your Maps ranking:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Proximity</strong> – Google maps relates the proximity of your businesses address to the city centre or suburb dictated in your listing. The closer you are to the city centre, the better the ranking based on your geo-relativity. Considering this, it is understandable that Google is trying to better the user experience by refining listings based on the actual proximity of a business to a targeted geographic keyword – and it makes sense, but at the same time, this measure of calculation is inherently flawed… Why? What if you’re one business with services targeting many different cities…?  Recent developments have indicated that Google has placed less emphasis on this attribute, but it’s still something you should definitely consider when placing your listings.The ways around it? If your business is multi-faceted and offers services in other locations – look at implementing some <a title="SEO practices" href="http://www.websalad.com.au/coreservices/seo/">SEO practices</a> that can assist in improving your online visibility for geo-targeted keywords: create landing pages, optimise your tags and headings.<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-979" title="mcbain-loafers" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/mcbain-loafers-300x225.gif" alt="mcbain-loafers" width="300" height="225" /></li>
<li><strong>Ratings and Reviews</strong> – This one is tricky. Google heightens the performance of your maps listings if you have positive ratings and reviews that bear direct relevance to the quality of your services. I guess you could say that Google local business center has a bit of a QA process in place for Maps that ensures that the listing in the number one spot is giving customers a reliable service that will add value to them as a result of their search.Promoting customer reviews of your service online has always been a grueling task, but nevertheless you should encourage feedback amongst your users to boost your local search authority. The message here…? Make your business as genuinely transparent as possible – not only will Google place more value on your listing, but customers will also appreciate the objective sentiment.<br />
<blockquote><p>Let it be noted that any unethical manipulation of positive reviews will result in your business being severely penalized by Google search – and by no means do we endorse this!</p></blockquote>
</li>
<li><strong>SEO 101</strong> – The organic search authority of your website does directly attribute to the performance of your business listing. Keeping this in mind, all standard SEO measures should be put in place within your website in order to make your domain as search friendly as possible. If you’re unsure  about standard practices, check out the <a title="google SEO guide" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/11/googles-seo-starter-guide.html">official Google search engine starter guide</a> to get you going.</li>
<li><strong>Keyword Relevancy </strong>– Keywords form the crux of any ranking calculation, so it is only logical that your Google local business listing should include keywords directly relevant to your business niche. If applicable, try to include keywords within the title of the business listing as well as within the business description. For example, if I owned a haggis restaurant in Sydney (god knows why), I’d want to be targeting a competitive keyword within my listing – let’s say “restaurant in Sydney”:<img class="size-full wp-image-968 aligncenter" title="google maps listing example" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/google-maps-listing-example.bmp" alt="google maps listing example" width="493" height="437" /></li>
<li><strong>Include media within your listing </strong>– Make sure you enrich your local business listing with as much media content as possible. This includes images and video. Ideally, you will want to include images and video hosted within Google affiliated websites – this means YouTube for video, and <a title="Google loves Panoramio!" rel="nofollow" href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2009/02/10/local-seo-tip-google-maps-loves-panoramios-geotagged-images/ " target="_blank">Panoramio</a> for image hosting.</li>
</ol>
<p>There’s a lot more to a business listing than you originally thought, right…? Definitely, but follow the above practices and you have my personal guarantee that you can’t go wrong!</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-982" title="waynes-world_Excellent" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/waynes-world_Excellent-225x300.jpg" alt="waynes-world_Excellent" width="225" height="300" /></p>
<p><strong>Just a further note on this article&#8230; If you&#8217;re looking for quantitative research that examines the positive and negative factors that can attribute to the calculation of a Google Maps ranking then the following article on </strong><a title="local search ranking factors" href="http://www.davidmihm.com/local-search-ranking-factors.shtml"><strong>local search ranking factors</strong></a><strong> is definitely worth checking out.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-for-google-maps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Tactics: Avoiding the red flags</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-tactics-avoiding-the-red-flags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-tactics-avoiding-the-red-flags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landing Page Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO red flags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.site.websalad/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the practice of SEO, you need to be cautious of some of the red flags that possess the power to damage your credibility and totally dismember all of the&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-740" title="courage" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/courage.jpg" alt="courage" width="144" height="144" />In the practice of SEO, you need to be cautious of some of the red flags that possess the power to damage your credibility and totally dismember all of the hard work you put in your SEO campaign. The outcome sounds horrible, but don&#8217;t panic yet! Let’s walk through some of the red flags that you should aim to avoid in any SEO practice to ensure that all of your hard work stays intact:<br />
</br><br />
</br></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Keep your SEO tactics to yourself</strong> – All it takes is one bitter blog reader, affiliate or competitor to issue a complaint to Google detailing the nature of your SEO tactics. For example, John Chow (author of JohnChow.com) – a blogger of considerable notoriety, openly discussed on his blog how he asked bloggers to link back to his blog with an anchored keyword. The end result? Google laid down the hammer and it took him over a year to regenerate a decent Page Rank.</li>
<li><strong>Don’t over-optimize your site with target keywords</strong> – Google indexes everything according to relevance, and not only this, it also has filters in place to nullify any keywords or phrases that have been aggressively targeted in landing pages or in meta tags. How to avoid this? Be liberal. Make your content relevant, and ensure that the application of your keywords isn’t too over-bearing. Take an outsider’s perspective – if someone can read your text and easily identify and keyword repetition, Google most certainly will act the same way. The key is to work with Google, and not against it.</li>
<li><strong>Don’t sculpt your Page Rank using tag attributes</strong> – Namely, the ‘rel=nofollow’ tag attribute, Google has since decided to disregard the value of this tag and for quite a valid reason. It was being used to nullify link authority and re-direct link juice to target landing pages &#8211; known more formally as &#8216;page rank scultping&#8217;. Some companies still choose to manipulate this tactic, but we recommend that it is something you should avoid – this technique is tired and highly temperamental.</li>
<li><strong>Artificial link profiles</strong> – Google filters out sites if their link profiles match any of the following criteria:
<ul>
<li>Links are too close together, or similar links recur through your page frequently.</li>
<li>The anchor text of all of your links is identical (they all re-direct to the same landing page).</li>
<li>You’re links aren’t deep enough to other pages</li>
<li>Links are low quality and irrelevant to the site content</li>
<li>If there are sidebar and footer links – these rank poorly.</li>
<li>Too many reciprocal links</li>
</ul>
</li>
<blockquote><p>Don’t try and manipulate Google’s search algorithm, as you will be quickly identified and neutralized!</p></blockquote>
<p>Right, so it sounds a little bit scarier than it actually is, but it’s not worth taking the chance.</p>
<li><strong>Finally, a common sense practice</strong> – Don’t use SEO to promote spammy websites! Adhere to the guidelines, and work <em>with</em> the Google algorithm.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-tactics-avoiding-the-red-flags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO: The Bing Way</title>
		<link>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-the-bing-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-the-bing-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.websalad.com.au/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the explosion of Bing.com onto the search marketing scene, search engine optimizers and internet marketers alike have been questioning the overall differentiation in search algorithms in contrast to the&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-714" title="bing versus google" src="http://www.websalad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/binggooglefight-copy-300x225.jpg" alt="bing versus google" width="278" height="208" />With the explosion of Bing.com onto the search marketing scene, search engine optimizers and internet marketers alike have been questioning the overall differentiation in search algorithms in contrast to the great Google monster. It’s time to get nerdy here, and without hindering away from the Geek Speak, let’s assess whether or not we should be tailoring our SEO tactics to accommodate Bing.com.</p>
<p>Firstly, let’s look at the structure of Bing search in comparison to Google. A simple search for a retail product, let’s say, ‘iphone’ will return search results as organized into 3 distinct formats. On the far left ‘related searches’, also known as the ‘explorer pane’ which are based on relevant categories – for example, in your search for iphone you will find that the explorer pane breaks the results down into categorical tabs. As a result from this search the tabs that appear individually relate to: price, geographical region, buying, unlocking, reviews, cost and news. How does this relate to SEO, exactly? Well as a result of the explorer pane, if you’re a provider of iphone accessories for example, you should be tailoring your target search terms to match the category in which you want to be listed on Bing. It’s a new level of search refinement that experts predict will be highly favoured amongst online shoppers.</p>
<p>Now let’s move across the page… In the center of the Bing SERP is your archetypal search format in which the raw results are listed and ranked according to keyword relevance and authority, and then on the far right you will find your sponsored links. Sounds a lot similar to Google, right? Aside from the results page layout, the features are virtually identical. But where Bing has made this prehistoric format innovative is its caching of extended meta data – if you hover over the right hand side of a search listing a small pane appears, giving you an extended insight into the content of the web page you’re looking to view complete with some links to other elements included in that web page. This is great for organic SEO, why? Simple – more of your site text is being fed into the Bing SERP display, which means that if you’re consistent with the use of your target keywords throughout your entire site copy, you significantly heighten your chances of being indexed with higher search engine authority – but in arguing this point; Google reads the organic relevance of your site text anyway.<br />
So is it worth alternating your SEO strategy to account for Bing’s newer features? The answer is No. Google already has, and will continue to set the standard for search engine optimization… Don’t believe me? Here it straight from the source itself:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Ultimately, SEO is still SEO. Bing doesn’t change that. Bing’s new user interface design simply adds new opportunities to searchers to find what the information they want more quickly and easily, and that benefits webmasters who have taken the time to work on the quality of their content and website design.”– Bing Webmaster Center Team, Microsoft</p></blockquote>
<p>At the end of the day, SEO is all about the quality of your content, intelligence of your site design and the execution of your targets. In essence, if you follow this universal notion, you can’t go wrong in ranking well in any SERP.</p>
<p>Think of Bing and Google to be similar to the video game characters Ken and Ryu from street fighter, both have similar functions, but different specialties &#8211; and one well always be favoured over the other!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.websalad.com.au/seo-the-bing-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

